Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 200-211 , September 2010

Second-Look Targeted Studies After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Practical Tips to Improve Lesion Identification

  • Isabelle Trop, MD, MPH, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Isabelle Trop, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Breast Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'université de Montréal, Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal, 3840 St-Urbain, Montréal, Québec, H2W 1T8, Canada
  • ,
  • Maude Labelle, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Julie David, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Marie-Hélène Mayrand, MD, FRCPC, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Lucie Lalonde, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada

References 

  1. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, et al. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: Utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology. 2003;227:856–861
  2. Wiratkapun C, Duke D, Nordmann AS, et al. Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: Value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:618–625
  3. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, et al. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg. 2005;190:592–594
  4. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal Hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR. 2007;188:684–690
  5. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging and reporting data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA. Mammography, 4th edition, 2003. Ultrasound, 1st edition, 2003. MRI, 1st edition 2003.
  6. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound. New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003;
  7. Yang WT, Ahuja A, Tang A, et al. High resolution sonographic detection of axillary lymph nodes metastases in breast cancer. J US Med. 1996;15:241–246
  8. Tesolin M, Lalonde L, Curpen NB, et al. Low cost marking clip after breast biopsies: Accuracy of positioning and stability over time. Abstract M06-1185, presented at RSNA 2001.
  9. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: Frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology. 1999;212:189–194
  10. Sickles EA. Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?. Radiology. 1999;213:11–14

PII: S0363-0188(09)00059-0

doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2009.07.006

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 200-211 , September 2010