Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 200-211, September 2010

Second-Look Targeted Studies After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Practical Tips to Improve Lesion Identification

  • Isabelle Trop, MD, MPH, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Isabelle Trop, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Breast Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'université de Montréal, Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal, 3840 St-Urbain, Montréal, Québec, H2W 1T8, Canada
  • ,
  • Maude Labelle, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Julie David, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Marie-Hélène Mayrand, MD, FRCPC, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
  • ,
  • Lucie Lalonde, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada

Second-look studies, so-called because a re-evaluation of the breast is performed after review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, offer the possibility of identifying correlates to MRI-detected lesions that were not previously suspected at mammography or ultrasound, thereby permitting immediate biopsy. To maximize the identification of ultrasound and mammographic correlates to MRI-identified lesions, one must carefully review the initial MRI examination as well as be cognizant of breast normal anatomy and variations in breast position across imaging modalities. We review the steps required for planification and realization of a successful second-look evaluation. After a correlate has been found and percutaneous biopsy performed, we recommend obtaining a T1-weighted noncontrast MRI sequence to verify metallic marker placement at the site of biopsy. This step ensures correct correlation between imaging modalities, provides immediate feedback for the radiologist, and, in case of error, allows the patient to be immediately redirected to repeat biopsy, often under MRI guidance. In the case of correct correlation, short-term follow-up is recommended, as for other breast percutaneous interventional procedures. We propose a simple management algorithm following second-look targeted studies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0363-0188(09)00059-0

doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2009.07.006

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 200-211, September 2010