Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 33-43, January 2009

Vascular Closure Devices: A Comparative Overview

  • Lye-Quen Hon, MB BCh, MRCP (UK), FRCR

      Affiliations

    • Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Lye-Quen Hon, MB BCh, MRCP (UK), FRCR, C Floor Radiology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2 JF, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Arul Ganeshan, BSc, MB BCh, MRCP (UK), FRCR

      Affiliations

    • John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Steven Mark Thomas, MB BS, MRCP (UK), FRCR, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Dinuke Warakaulle, MB BS, MRCP (UK), FRCR

      Affiliations

    • Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Jagalpathy Jagdish, MB BS, MRCPCH (UK)

      Affiliations

    • Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Raman Uberoi, BSc, MB BChir, MRCP (UK), FRCR

      Affiliations

    • John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

The use of closure devices is widespread and becoming more common. Radiologists performing arterial access procedures should be aware of when and how to use them, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various devices, and any complications that may occur. This review intends to provide an overview of these devices, focusing on how they work, their efficacy in achieving hemostasis, any risks associated with their use, and our view as to which should be used for particular indications. There are three main categories of vascular closure devices: collagen based, suture based, and staples and clips. Newer generation devices use the same technique of closure and there are some that utilize newer techniques. Vascular closure devices have been demonstrated to reduce time to hemostasis, facilitate ambulation, and potentially decrease length of stay. The choice of a device would depend on the availability of that particular device, operator preference, anticipation of repeat arterial access, and size of the arteriotomy hole.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0363-0188(08)00019-4

doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2008.02.002

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 33-43, January 2009