Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 127-137, May 2008

Understanding Hallux Valgus Deformity: What the Surgeon Wants to Know from the Conventional Radiograph

  • Samir A. Chhaya, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Samir A. Chhaya, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229.
  • ,
  • Melissa Brawner, DPM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Podiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Paul Hobbs, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Neal Chhaya, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, Stanmore, London, UK.
  • ,
  • Glenn Garcia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Rebecca Loredo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX

Hallux valgus deformity is a common and a significant source of symptoms. It can interfere with daily activities and affects the quality of life of many people. Imaging evaluation is performed almost exclusively by conventional radiography and systematic evaluation of the conventional radiograph can provide the clinician with the necessary information to choose the correct surgical procedure. The radiologist should appreciate the various sites of angular deformity that can be associated with hallux valgus deformity, the nature of the articulations within the first ray, the presence of a bunion, the degree of sesamoid subluxation, and the quality of the bone stock. Systematic radiographic evaluation is vital for ensuring a good surgical outcome. All the conventional radiographic features that influence management are defined and quantified within this review and, importantly, their clinical significance is highlighted, allowing for a more purposeful radiographic interpretation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0363-0188(07)00101-6

doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.11.004

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 127-137, May 2008