Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 68-83 , March 2009

Practical Applications of Nuclear Medicine in Imaging Breast Cancer

References 

  1. Schillaci O, Buscombe JR. Breast scintigraphy today: Indications and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(suppl 1):S35–S45
  2. Taillefer R. Clinical applications of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:100–115
  3. Khalkhali I, Diggles LE, Taillefer R, et al. Procedure guideline for breast scintigraphy (Society of Nuclear Medicine). J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1233–1235
  4. Schillaci O, Danieli R, Filippi L, et al. Scintimammography with a hybrid SPECT/CT imaging system. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:557–562
  5. Hussain R, Buscombe JR. A meta-analysis of scintimammography: An evidence-based approach to its clinical utility. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:589–594
  6. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Kieper DA, et al. High-resolution scintimammography: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:909–915
  7. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, et al. Occult breast cancer: Scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer. Radiology. 2005;237:274–280
  8. Mueller B, O'Connor MK, Blevis I, et al. Evaluation of a small cadmium zinc telluride detector for scintimammography. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:602–609
  9. Rhodes DJ, O'Connor MK, Phillips SW, et al. Molecular breast imaging: A new technique using technetium Tc 99m scintimammography to detect small tumors of the breast. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:24–30
  10. O'Connor MK, Phillips SW, Hruska CB, et al. Molecular breast imaging: Advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors. Breast J. 2007;13:3–11
  11. Mariani G, Erba P, Villa G, et al. Lymphoscintigraphic and intraoperative detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients: The nuclear medicine perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85:112–122
  12. Kelley MC, Hansen N, McMasters KM. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:49–61
  13. James TA, Edge SB. Sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:53–58
  14. Dauway EL, Giuliano R, Pendas S, et al. Lymphatic mapping: A technique providing accurate staging for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 1999;6:145–154
  15. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Roarke MC. Injection of (99m)Tc-labeled sulfur colloid the day before operation for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping is as successful as injection the day of operation. Am J Surg. 2004;188:685–689
  16. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA. A concordance study of subareolar and subdermal injections for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Am J Surg. 2004;188:423–425
  17. Hong J, Chog E, Soni N, et al. Extra-axillary sentinel node biopsy in the management of early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:942–948
  18. Dauway EL, Sanders R, Friedland J, et al. Innovative diagnostics for breast cancer: new frontiers for the new millennium using radioactive seed localization. Surg Forum. 1999;50:348–349
  19. Gray RJ, Giuliano R, Dauway EL, et al. Radioguidance for nonpalpable primary lesions and sentinel lymph node(s). Am J Surg. 2001;182:404–406
  20. Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: Radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:711–715
  21. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, et al. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg. 2004;188:377–380
  22. Pavlicek W, Walton HA, Karstaedt PJ, et al. Radiation safety with use of I-125 seeds for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:909–915
  23. Benard F, Turcotte E. Imaging in breast cancer: Single-photon computed tomography and positron-emission tomography. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:153–162
  24. Eubank WB, Mankoff DA. Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:84–99
  25. McDonough MD, DePeri ER, Mincey BA. The role of positron emission tomographic imaging in breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004;6:62–68
  26. Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Mourtzikos KA, et al. Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:254–262
  27. Scheidhauer K, Walter C, Seemann MD. FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(suppl 1):S70–S79
  28. Quon A, Gambhir SS. FDG-PET and beyond: Molecular breast cancer imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1664–1673
  29. Avril N, Rose CA, Schelling M, et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: Use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3495–3502
  30. Eubank WB, Mankoff DA, Vesselle HJ, et al. Detection of locoregional and distant recurrences in breast cancer patients by using FDG PET. Radiographics. 2002;22:5–17
  31. Weir L, Worsley D, Bernstein V. The value of FDG positron emission tomography in the management of patients with breast cancer. Breast J. 2005;11:204–209
  32. Isasi CR, Moadel RM, Blaufox MD. A meta-analysis of FDG-PET for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90:105–112
  33. Vranjesevic D, Filmont JE, Meta J, et al. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for predicting outcome in previously treated breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:325–329
  34. Wolfort RM, Li BD, Johnson LW, et al. The role of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG positron emission tomography in the detection of recurrence in symptomatic patients with stages II and III breast cancer. World J Surg. 2006;30:1422–1427
  35. Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D, et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (“positron emission mammography”) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:309–323

PII: S0363-0188(07)00079-5

doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.10.003

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 68-83 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution