Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 11-20, January 2007

Evaluation of Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Metacarpophalangeal Joints with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography

  • Jeffrey J. Peterson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jeffrey J. Peterson, MD, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224.
  • ,
  • Laura W. Bancroft, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
  • ,
  • Mark J. Kransdorf, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
  • ,
  • Thomas H. Berquist, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
  • ,
  • Thomas H. Magee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Neuroskeletal Imaging, Merritt Island, FL
    • Department of Radiology, Neuroimaging Institute, Melbourne, FL.
  • ,
  • Peter M. Murray, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Injuries of the collateral ligaments of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the hand require accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment to prevent loss of function. The most common and well-known collateral ligament injury is injury to the ulnar collateral ligament of the first MCP joint of the hand, often referred to as a gamekeeper injury. Although less common, injuries involving the collateral ligaments of the second through fifth digits and the radial collateral ligament of the first digit also occur. The diagnosis of collateral ligament injury is often made clinically, however, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the MCP joints can be very useful in the evaluation of severity of the injury. This provides important information for the hand surgeon and aids in treatment planning. Imaging of the collateral ligaments requires small fields of view and several technical considerations can provide improved image quality. These factors will be discussed and illustrated in this article.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0363-0188(06)00062-4

doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.10.002

Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 11-20, January 2007